All User Reviews

Real experiences and feedback from our community of users who have tried various software alternatives.

AJ

Atom has been my go-to text editor for years. The customizability through packages is unparalleled. I love being able to tailor the editor to my specific needs and workflows. The community support is also fantastic, with a plethora of resources available online and active forums. I highly recommend it to any developer.

BW

Atom is a solid choice for web development. It handles large files reasonably well, and the built-in Git integration is incredibly helpful for managing code repositories. While it can be resource-intensive at times, the benefits of its extensibility and customization options outweigh the drawbacks. I especially appreciate the ability to use snippets for faster coding.

CD

Atom served me well during my initial transition to code editors, although I eventually migrated to a different editor due to performance constraints when dealing with large data files common in data science. However, the package ecosystem is robust, and the community is supportive, making it a good choice for learning the ropes. The user interface is also relatively intuitive.

DM

I absolutely adore Atom! The themes are beautiful and I can switch between light and dark modes easily. Furthermore, the plugins for autocompletion and linting have significantly improved my workflow and code quality. Although it can be slower compared to some other editors, the flexibility and aesthetic appeal make it worth it. I would recommend it for front end development.

EB

Atom is a versatile editor that I use for both front-end and back-end development. The cross-platform compatibility is a major plus, and the collaborative editing features are fantastic for working with remote teams. It's not perfect, and there are some performance issues from time to time, but overall it's a reliable and powerful tool. Definitely worth trying out the different packages.

FG

Atom is a decent editor, but its performance can be inconsistent, especially when handling large projects or many open files. The community packages are fantastic and extend functionality significantly. However, the performance problems can be frustrating at times, leading me to explore other options with better efficiency. Still a good option for smaller personal projects.

GW

Atom's Python support, with the appropriate packages, is quite good. I appreciate the ability to debug directly within the editor, and the code completion features save me a lot of time. I've found the UI to be intuitive. It has made coding and debugging with Python a more seamless experience. I continue using Atom for my Python projects.

HB

As a new developer, I found Atom very easy to learn and customize. The interface is clean, and there are tons of helpful tutorials available online. It helped me immensely when I was starting out. I appreciate how customizable it is. I would recommend it to any other beginner developers as it gets you up and running extremely quickly. It is also great for collaborative projects.

IG

While Atom is decent for basic text editing and scripting, it falls short for more complex system administration tasks. The lack of advanced features and the sluggish performance when dealing with large configuration files make it less suitable than other specialized editors for this purpose. I would only recommend it for simple tasks, if at all.

JP

Atom is useful for scripting in my game development projects. I appreciate the Git integration and the ability to customize the interface to suit my needs. It's not ideal for very large codebases, but for smaller projects and scripting tasks, it works well. I found the plugin ecosystem to be extremely helpful in getting set up for my desired language. It also supports code highlighting.